Opening Doors For Taking A Leadership Role

Knowing the difference between a public administrator and a leader can be confusing. Not knowing the difference has put people in roles where they could not thrive. The belief that one’s intuitive knowledge is enough to lead is self-misleading. Leadership is more of a personal job while a public administrator does a more non-personal job. A leader imposes the peoples will by being the one harnessing their aspirations. The harnessing process requires them to have productive responses to what is said, agreed or happens. The public administrator is supposed to be the manager for the interests of those that are already in a voting bloc or authorized group. AI as the leader can find and apply data evidence to help fix the unequal access to power question, and can separate a person's opinions, theories, beliefs, and advice from the actual first party witness account of what happened. AI technologies can bring maximum utility of citizen input, the technology must be employed so that it can prove its leadership ability. Defining the metrics for what the AI models can achieve is raising accountability for engaging and organizing. AI can organize around the firsthand account of what happened from the time closest to when it happened. AI can incorporate the first party narratological component into organizing, defining problems, and improving solutions. AI has the inherent ability to keep the individual input in context while making it simultaneously scalable for organized engagement.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AI Can't Hide Missing Firsthand Answers About What Happened

I’ve reviewed mountains of crime reports, citizen complaints and journalist renderings of what happened. I started with using CRM and then comparative analysis tools to scan and assess for useful but missing input from the firsthand accounts of what happened. In so doing I would notice an answer that could be in the file but was not, the answer to what the affected person wants to see happen was always missing. To organize and advocate requires knowing the belief of the individual that has the problem. It’s easy to see someone else’s problem as simpler, harder, or easier. What we can learn from both scripture, science and AI reveals a necessity to ask the affected person how he or she rates their discomfort. From the knowledge of what affected persons reported I & AI were able to design a first-generation model to work as a solution. Welcome to mate3.com Community Communication Partnership 9.0
Read more

Quick Intro To Mate3 Networking

Image
Introduction: The mate3 network receives formats, gives responses, presents and ships 3 firsthand answers about what happened. The mate3 network is for delivering productive and connectible responses. Each user of the mate3 network gets productive responses that are specifically related to the incoming 3 firsthand answers. The founding of the mate3 network was based on an activist organizer who learned that formatted firsthand accounts of what happened will get twenty times more attention, be more engaging, and give a 98% more exact translation of what the person giving the answers is saying and wants. The Mate3 network reduces the time and cost that it takes to receive, format, organize, store, ship, and present three firsthand answers. How To Answer The Mate3 Questions: The first question is what happened to you? This question is referring to the experience that you want to network for productive responses. The second question is what would you like to see happen? This question refer
Read more